A Perspective on Life
Science today, as presented to the general public, seems to be received as either incomprehensible with the use of so many specialized words or by the employment of baffling math that doesn’t make much sense to most readers. And to further escalate this plight, a strong movement has now arisen among those who claim to be “science deniers.” The situation has become quite dangerous. The public must be able to grasp the basics of science to participate and engage in informed decisions that are today are facing the US and, indeed, the entire world.
I am a physicist. I have written a new book in which I present to those interested and curious members of the general public, intelligible explanations of the fundamental thinking and the rationale of the great scientists as they developed their theories.
I am a physicist. I have written a new book in which I present to those interested and curious members of the general public, intelligible explanations of the fundamental thinking and the rationale of the great scientists as they developed their theories.
The book employs many of science’s great advancements to address the big questions of life. That is:
Where the Hell Are We?
from When the Hell Are We?
What the Hell Are We?
Who the Hell Are We?
Why the Hell Are We?
from When the Hell Are We?
What the Hell Are We?
Who the Hell Are We?
Why the Hell Are We?
The book is written in an informal and readable format offering an imagined dialogue between the reader and the author. It explains the overall rationale of some great thinkers without using heavy applications of math – and also with no technical jargon. And included are many images and sketches illustrating the concepts plus a portrayal of major events in the lives of some famous scientists – they too were people who lived their lives struggling with the same everyday problems we all face.
